Dirty cops helping crooked lawyers!  Last month in my well-justified excoriation of the Powell River police I explained how the lawyer-controlled British Columbia government has declared all-out war on people named as defendants (a.k.a. respondents) in civil lawsuits. 

This month I’m going to introduce you to my friend Ken who is the ULTIMATE example of just how nasty things can get for defendants.  Just like happened to me in the Earl Graham-ICBC insurance fraud fiasco I detailed, Ken’s story too showcases the barbaric feudal system our ruthless lawyer-dominated government operates under.  But even more alarming, his story demonstrates how attorneys are using the police as strong-arm muscle to intimidate and threaten defendants.

Ken is a man I’ve gotten to know because we have several things in common.  We both live south of town, we both take the bus, we both ride bicycles, and we’ve both been unfairly picked on by the legal system.  And what Ken’s been put through is no joke.  When he disclosed to me the abuse he’s been subjected to by the Powell River cops I was speechless.

I used to often see Ken riding his bike into town and one day when we were both on the bus I told him that I too was a cyclist and struck up a conversation about cycling with him.  He explained to me he no longer drives a vehicle because the government was refusing to renew his driver’s license.  There they go harassing drivers again!  I’ll explain more about that further on.

Ken was very happy about one thing though.  He’d fitted a small engine onto his pedal bike which made getting around town a lot easier for him.  Motorized bikes are fairly common in Powell River.  Both of the bike shops in town sell electric bikes and I see a man riding an electric three-wheel vehicle in and out of town almost every day I’m on the highway.  I also occasionally see people riding bikes fitted with gas-powered engines too, which was what Ken had.  And I could understand why Ken might’ve been thrilled about motorizing his bike.  He lives about twenty miles outside of town and that’s a long ride to get groceries.  Plus, he looks like he’s about seventy and getting around on a pedal bike might not be that easy for him either.

But one day when I saw him on the bus and asked him how he was making out with his motorized bike he gave me bad news.  He recounted how a zombie RCMP officer had tailed him around town while he was on his bike and finally confronted him when he stopped at Canadian Tire and gave him a hard time.  He explained how the angry zombie cop had told him it was against the law to put an engine on a bike and ordered him to remove the motor from the bicycle right away.  I was heartbroken when Ken divulged this because of the immense joy he’d expressed when he’d told me all about how he’d put a motor on his bicycle that day on the bus months previously.  It was as though the town bully had taken a child’s cherished toy away from him.  What a bunch of assholes!

But the incident on his bike wasn’t Ken’s only experience of being maltreated by the cops.  He later recounted a previous incident he’d had with the police that absolutely mortified me when I heard about it.

Ken told me how, back in 2012 when he still had a car and was permitted to drive, he’d come to an RCMP roadblock and had been asked to present his driver’s license to a police officer.  When he did the cops promptly arrested him, claiming they were charging him with the crime of “evading service.”  Evading service?  The zombie cops said that because he’d refused to accept material from a Vancouver lawyer in a civil court case, he’d committed the crime of evading service and had to be taken into custody.  Ridiculous!  This was just another instance of the police fabricating a false charge against an innocent person like they did to me.

For one thing, I find it extremely hard to believe that this man made any conscious effort to evade anyone who might have tried to serve something on him.  I just don’t see it.  Furthermore, since Ken had a driver’s license, his mail address would be explicitly known to the government and they could easily send him material through the mail.  And as well, it isn’t illegal, let alone a reason to arrest someone, for not accepting letters from lawyers or from anyone else.  Nor is it your problem if a lawyer isn’t able to locate you for service.  It’s the lawyer’s problem.  And evading service isn’t a crime anyway.  How do I know that?  I looked it up in the Criminal Code.  The crime of evading service does not exist.  I couldn’t find it in my copy anyway.

Saying it’s a crime not to accept nasty hate mail letters from lawyers is about the same as saying it’s a crime to refuse to take their phone calls -- such a notion is utterly ridiculous!  And most of the crap lawyers fire through the mail amounts to crime itself -- in the form of mail fraud!

Regardless, everybody knows that plaintiffs have a legal obligation to attempt to inform defendants of court proceedings, and if they aren’t able to locate or make contact with them then the action simply comes to a grinding halt or goes forward without them.  In no way is the ARREST of a defendant part of the lawful process of serving a defendant with something; it’s just intimidation, perhaps out of frustration on the part of the mentally ill psychotic nutjob lawyer.

Can the plaintiff, or the plaintiff’s lawyer, be arrested for not serving a defendant with important material, something they’re guilty of doing all the time?  Of course not!  So why do plaintiffs have that power?

Making the evading service charge even more ludicrous, when I myself inquired with the government about that very issue regarding a legal matter I was dealing with I was told that plaintiffs aren’t even supposed to serve defendants with court material!

As I explained last month, in 2010 I was informed by the Law Society of British Columbia, the government organization that oversees lawyers and is responsible for the administration of justice in the province, that people being sued in BC need not concern themselves with the service of court materials.  I was told that plaintiffs and their lawyers have NO LEGAL OBLIGATION (!) to inform defendants of anything, including of lawsuits filed against them.  Do not expect to be served with any material if you’re named as a defendant in a civil lawsuit was what the Law Society said to me.  Now, this declaration may have been completely illegal on the Law Society’s part (and I believe it was), but since they’re the ones in charge of the justice system we have no choice but to accept what they say as the de facto law of the land.

No, Ken wasn’t arrested for refusing to receive material from a lawyer, he was arrested simply because he’d been named as a defendant in a lawsuit.  Ken had all of his civil rights stripped away from him, just like happened to me when I was supposedly sued by Earl Graham.  Defendants get violently pushed around in a variety of brutal ways by plaintiffs in British Columbia, including by being illegally detained without grounds.

I myself was arrested several times after I’d been named as a respondent in a sham civil lawsuit being heard in the BC Supreme Court in Vancouver.  I spent time behind bars in White Rock, North Vancouver (two jails!), Port Coquitlam, Maple Ridge, Surrey, Squamish (two jails!), Langley and Vancouver (three jails!!!).  Talk about being a human trafficking victim!  And all of those detentions were directly related to the Vancouver civil action.  And as well, Earl Graham’s Powell River lawsuit against me was preceded by his phony hit-and-run charge from the RCMP in which I was ordered to report to the local jailhouse.  That’s how nasty the legal system is in British Columbia and it’s got to change.

Ken’s ordeal is a completely naked example of the intense hunger Canadian lawyers have for oppressing and subjugating the population.  Canadian lawyers, all lawyers actually, have a hidden agenda, and that agenda is to literally enslave the populace.  Do as we say or you’ll be punished.  Bluntly put, lawyers are the Illuminati, the shadowy elite class that some people believe rule the world.  They want us to be robots under their complete control who will obey their commands without question.  The reason is because it’s much easier for them to do their job that way, that job being to confiscate all of the cash, land and other assets they haven’t already taken from us.

Ken’s ordeal is also a raw demonstration of the unlimited power lawyers hold over the government, specifically over the police.  The RCMP were ordered by a Vancouver lawyer to break the law and arrest an innocent man without justification, without grounds, and instead of opposing such criminally unlawful activity they carried it out.  This shows how the police are just paid-off servants of lawyers who’ll do what attorneys ask them to do like trained dogs.  They’re merely hollow puppets whose strings are pulled by the bar.  And now I’m thinking that the hassle Ken got for riding his motorized bike in town was probably tied into the lawsuit too.  It sounds like he’s being deliberately identified and targeted for harassment by the police.

And, adding further skepticism to the legality of this entire affair, Ken told me the civil court action stems from an old divorce proceeding involving an ex-wife who lives in another province altogether, yet it’s Vancouver attorneys associated with some collections agency that are actually going after him for the alimony cash they claim he owes -- NOT his wife!